Pfsense vs isp router reddit. The only time ANY go down is for FW/patch updates.

Pfsense vs isp router reddit If you meant mini PC vs pfsense Netgate products, the official products get support and you know it "should work". I'm curious if there's been any writeup or comparison chart made comparing what's available in Firewalla Gold to setting up a similar pfSense/opnSense box. In my defense, I could easily get away with 3, but I needed one to be able to push out to my front porch to get a decent signal to the camera that, at one time, lived out there, and that required a device in the middle of the east side of the apartment, where all of the other APs are on the west side of the The PC will be fast enough do 1 Gbps no matter what. I'm looking to upgrade from an ISP supplied modem/router to either pfSense or ERX on a 25/5, soon to be 100/50 connection. From what I've read, they're basically the same except for OPNSense has a better UI, better Wireguard support, and more packages, so I was leaning towards going with OPNSense. 10G firewalls on the other hand more useful but are also a lot more expensive (e. If it were me, I'd put an sfp card in the pfSense box and plug the fiber directly into it as adding a switch in front of it just complicates the I'm setting up a home network with a Unifi AP and a firewall, and I was wondering whether I should use PFSense or OPNSense. I'm worried whether I will get a worse performance with Protectli (opnsense firewall router) when compared to something like Mikrotik which is built for the sole I've seen a lot of information that indicates firewalls and routers should be split whether ISP > firewall > router or ISP > router > firewall. 300/35 pipe) so it's a bit of waste of power and hardware to have a dedicated box. Most commercial routers have CPU(s) with very low performance compared to a dedicated PC. QoS in pfSense is a wild animal and does need taming; can take a while. The WAP I've chosen is EAP 620HD. Sep 28, 2018 · When your modem/router is in bridge mode, that IP is given to whatever piece of equipment is next in line, which in your case will be pfSense. It all seems pretty cool and after some investigation I think the Dream Machine is the center of the Ubiquiti/Unifi setup. Consumer Router for me was providing me with 20%ish of my Total ISP Speed. Depending on Hardware Choice, the PFSense Box will also handle OpenVPN more Stable. Commercial routers are expensive and typically you have to pay a subscription for the advanced services like content filtration and IPS. I've been looking at Pfsense and read it provides Hello, For years I have been using my own router (with openwrt) behind the one of my ISP, but it's really getting old with poor wifi/bandwidth, whereas the one of my ISP has been upgraded with the latest technologies, so I'm considering ditching my old one and using the other (ISP) for my LAN also. Compared to many options it is easy to use, yet powerful and highly customizable. DD-WRT is lightweight vs. Just looking for some guidance. The first two that come to mind are USG and PFSense. I wanted to see what is currently most popular for routers in homelab use. I'm wondering how these speeds affect each other. So that makes so much more sense. I had pfSense for a while, but I just wanted to do more with it and I'm not that comfortable with BSD so I switched to what I know best, Linux 😊 Not too many options for NICs either. The only "issue" (only, as far as I know) if you want to open ports in your pfsense, you need to open and forward to the pfsense instance in your ISP router too. The pfSense box has one trunk link into the core, with only the untrusted and guest vlans allowed on the trunk, and the other link is connected directly to the ERL, which it default routes towards. internet <--> isp's box <--> pfsense? <--> OpenWRT wifi router <--> all other devices. The rules are on the 'gateway' or the router. Apr 30, 2022 · It can be done on pfSense or Untangle firewall, but not on Asus routers. I'd love to hear thoughts from those who have experience with both. pfSense can be put on low end and high end hardware. Home routers don't have required CPU processing power for this. Will I need pfsense in addition to that or can OpenWRT do enough for my use Spf+ support strictly limited number of adapters, if you think you will use this to connect 1gbs fiber - know that this will not work. When looking for a firewall appliance to try this out, however, they all seem to be router/firewall combos. 10G routers aren’t too terribly expensive but they don’t do much in a non ISP, or large business setting. I feel like it is a bit of overkill based on how beefy the optiplex is but I personally would rather have excess resources on my Firewall/Router than not enough. Depending on your requirements, getting a bare metal server to run pfSense can be pretty cheap. I would vote for starting with an ER-X, especially if your ISP speed is LT ~500mbps. A faster PC/device will help if you do encryption and VLANs and stuff. I highly suggest pfSense for anyone wanting to do more than just plug and play with a generic consumer/ISP router. I've used pfSense as a router for gone 10 years (since 1. Control: an ISP router/firewall is remotely managed & controlled by the ISP. PFSense Box for me was providing me with 90ish% of my Total ISP Speed. I was thinking of having the ISP modem go directly to one Ethernet port on the pfSense and the other port go to unmanaged switches that go to the rest of my network devices and wireless access points. x. Turn off isp router wifi, because I'm using unifi aps behind my pfsense. PfSense is also great to integrate into, pull logs, Telegraf, Grafana, etc. Options ISP "modem" ---> firewall ---> Router ---> switch and access points Preferred option 2) ISP "modem" ---> Router ---> firewall ---> switch and access points. 5gb wan + Intel 4x2. It's served me well for a vast majority of links; good quality ADSL, poor quality ADSL, DOCSIS, 3/4G, vDSL as well as a BGP router on an ethernet/fibre. 4. 56Gbps for router speed and 881 Mbps for firewall. Feb 5, 2014 · If one is savvy enough to build their own router based on pfsense, then at the minimum they should look at building based on supported hardware. They have far exceeded my expectations for reliability and flexibility. What would be the pros and cons of going for a wired router with APs as opposed to pfSense? ISP router -> intel nuc -> wifi ap -> pc. Present ISP connection is (100/5) but I might move to a location with ATT fiber (1000/1000), so my router should be able to handle that as well. At which point (in terms of requirements) does having an OPNsense/pfSense box start being worth (economically speaking) over a commercial solution from a reputable manufacturer like Mikrotik or Cisco? Talking about a (W)ISP environment, of course, and taking into account the initial investment (hardware) and the running cost (electricity). But obviously that's wrong now that you've explained that. Every time i tried to reply to anyone i One single wavelength is used by the OLT for ISP-to-customer traffic, while a different single wavelength is used by all the ONUs on the segment for customer-to-ISP traffic(*). Firewalls focus on protecting systems and networks, and not on maintaining connectivity or rate-limiting or load-distributing traffic flows. Hey fellow tech nerds! Newbie here so please go easy on me! I have a great Unraid setup in my garage with lots of things like plex and sonarr and pi hole running smoothly - all connected to my Asus RT-AX88U router. As a router/simple firewall it works great for my 1Gbps connection. The advantage of virtualizing pfsense for me is that I can run the domain controller and a small docker instance as separate vms to handle DC type stuff and DNS (pihole) and the docker idrac client. One common home network recommendation is to ditch the ISP-provided gateway and replace it with an ISP-compatible modem and using your own router. I do have one further question now though to try and understand even more. Looking to buy a netgate pfsense box- possibly the netgate 2100. Actually, my ISP router is in bridged mode to my PFsense box (so it's before my PFSense box instead of after). I have been looking to build a router due to, lots of connected devices and current AC1900 (TP link & Asus) are straining under the load. Easier to setup, use and configure. I'd be looking at $550-$650 ($400 USD) if I wanted to have a decent go at pfSense without many compromises. So they are inbound from the machine in to the router. On a software level what are the selling points of OpenWrt vs pfsense? I suggest making a list of functions you want your router to perform now, or possibly down the road, and then comparing the two. I initially tried using the pfSense box as my border router, but for whatever reason, it didn't play nice with DHCPv6 with my ISP. . Today I have successfully managed to get IPv6 /56 prefix from my ISP and pass it down to LAN interface using 'Track Interface' feature of pfSense. Maybe its something in that direction Active leases database is not transferred between ISC and KEA on the switch (same for switching back to ISC). I am working on my home network and I'd like to add a router/firewall. I do like the Netgate devices and they do a good job of making them upgrade-able but I prefer running pfSense on a computer, as I can easily swap that out if I need to. My next step up would be a $250 pfSense box. Feb 18, 2024 · Fortunately on my ISP router, I can select which of 4x Lan ports goes into bridge mode, so re-accessing the ISP admin page will be possible using one of the other ports, until I learn how to setup VIP as you describe. Since you already have AX88U, you're familiar with Asuswrt UI and your ISP is 100/100Mbps, I would recommend keeping AX88U. pfSense. However, I see that IPFire has simpler UI and Sophos has even better UI. On the other hand, there are better priced options for managed wired routers e. Instead of using a consumer router, I was thinking about using a pfSense router on a home built PC with 2 Ethernet ports. That also means, again. x on your WAN port of pfsense. As a hyper-V vm the Ressource DD-WRT is lightweight vs. Currently my ISP comes in and I have the ATT BGW210 in IP passthrough to my current router (Asus RT-AX92U pair in wireless mesh). Also run Unifi controller, VPN server and a few other apps on it. For reference I currently use ATT fiber. Its performance as a router also will depend on your bandwidth requirements and what tasks you expect the router to perform. Same with RAM. pfSense sits between my core switch and my ISP doing ipv4 natting and firewalling. An edge router would be a massive step down for, say, my office. Ahoi, I was trying to get familiar with pfSense but it was to mich to configure for my purposes of temporary replacing an USG until I get a replacement. While investigating: I found that this sub usually recommends PFSense or OPNSense. g. I got a NetEqualizer NE3000, which is a rebranded 1U Supermicro Server CSE-512, and repurposed it for $100 shipped. They might decide to silently change some setting and impact your security. providing packet/filtering After some tweaking i have to confirm that the PPPoE implementation on Pfsense is a relly big bottleneck when using 1Gigabit FTTH connections. 168. I use my PFSense box as egress with firewall rules for each vlan. This sounds like a (now) fixed problem in Mikrotiks Routers were the router didnt send the prefix deprecation anounxement to the clients when the isp chagens the prefix. pfSense can have a steep learning curve for anything fancy. KEA also starts assigning IP addresses that are in use by other devices that got it earlier from ISC and lease time not passed yet. Ubiquiti EdgeRouter ER-4. First of all there is a pfsense community edition that is absolutely free. Consumer routers lack features available on pfSense. I would most likely get a new managed switch and run a lag to it with a router on a stick setup so the firewall can manage all of the traffic between vlans. 3 of them are UniFi Nano HD devices (for the footprint). When my pfSense hardware arrives, do I have to bridge the LAN and WAN interfaces ? Or, can I simply connect the pfSense WAN interface to the ONT and LAN interface to my switch and just route between the two? I hope I'm making sense. Now looking I was needing a good firewall to run on separate hardware for my line in from my ISP. I'm running pfSense on ESXi with a little Lenovo desktop. I plan on using this for my edge router and firewall. The only time ANY go down is for FW/patch updates. And not like low-end APs. Pfsense for me is pretty light in terms of resources (am on. But any router truly capable of routing 1000mb was $300 or more (this was several years ago) I had been using pfSense in my lab (and at work for our virtual hosting farm) and was pretty happy with the throughput. Ultimately, I'd rather not bridge. My Consumer Routers Disconnect or provide me with a lower Bandiwdth than my Current Setup. New to homelabbing and pfsense. I can only tell it from the perspective of my setup. Consumer routers use basic ARM chips circa 2010 cell phones. In that way, pfSense becomes the "owner" of that attack surface, instead of the modem/router. So I decided to build a little experiment with some of my homelab hardware. So you might want some kind of setup like ISP router -> IPv6 subnet with the pfsense box and trusted, well-maintained devices (like the "DMZ" in old-school firewall setups), and then setting up IPv6 NAT (or some kind of 4over6) on the pfsense box and connecting any vulnerable devices behind that. ERX has a very attractive $50 price point. This is the edge router, which serves as the boundary between your internal network and the outside world (the internet). Your nuc (pfsense) should, when configured correctly and dhcp is used on the ISP router, get an ip-address of 192. We'd lose the IPS/IDS, built in unifi controller for protect and access, guest portal, etc etc. They can't do it if you control that box. Or should connect it through my network behind my router? I would prefer having it behind my router. The end goal for my setup would be: pfSense_router_wan0--> ISP's ONT Box I am running a homebuilt pfsense router at home (Dell SFF, quad hp nic) and running omada APs, switches, routers at work (3 different, separate sites) The level of detail and control in pfsense vs omada is incredible. pfsense vs OpenWRT: From what I have read, I will need OpenWRT anyway if I want to run a privacy-focused open source wifi router as pfsense is not focused on wifi but on firewalling. Jun 7, 2021 · Do you have any experience with pfSense/OPNSense firewalls? If not, this is an entire router OS and you'll need time to learn how to configure it. You need to connect the WAN port of your nuc to one of the ISP roters LAN port. The bandwidth in each direction is shared among all the customers on that one fiber segment (the number of (potential) customers per OLT is called the split ratio). I had to accept the double nat compromise but i can go almost full speed after I would want to run IPS and have room for future ISP upgrades. ISP circuit connects to YOUR ISP router. The summary says that it can do 1. I was thinking on buying a device that could run PFsense to set my ISP router to bridge only mode, but I came across Ubiquiti. io/ It’s much simpler and very similar to configuring a Cisco device. If you don't like Unifi that's ok, but we can't pretend that edgeos or pfsense or mikrotik are inherently better or worse I have one of the fanless black routers sold on amazon and aliexpress, marketed for running pfsense, runming a celeron n5105, 8gb ram, 2. In my home network, I use Cisco 3560CX as my core switch which handles inter-vlan routing. Anyway, at the end of story, i've placed my Pfsense box behind the main ISP Router configuring Pfsense as DMZ device. I let the isp router as it is, I give a wan ip address and set all my network behind the pfsense instance. pfSense plays the nicest with dedicated Intel NICs vs using USB NICs (with varying chipsets), if something is misconfigured you could have a potential leak from the outside world to your hypervisor, etc. The statement hold good only if you want to just loadon pfsense on any old equipment that you have lying around and expect it to work. When most people are talking about pfsense they say router but they are mainly talking about the firewall aspect of pfsense. For true Gigabit IDS/IPS x86 multi-core CPU is needed with multi-threaded package like Suricata. One of the fundamental principles we stick to behind this architectural decision is this: Now to the point. So in general (expecting that the ISP connection is not the bottleneck) a PC would work better if the hardware in it is stronger (assuming you have a correct os on it, like pfsense, routeros, etc). Very easy to set up VLANs with a script, I could supply one if you wanted. 5gb lan ports, so neither Linux (openwrt) or freebsd (*sense) should cause any issues AFAIK It's hard to manage, but developing the skills is important for me. x days). You sound knowledgeable, I might try to build a pfsense router out of an old Dell or buy Quotom Mini PC or BYO mini ITX. Interested to hear the current thinking on pfSense vs OPNsense but thought it may be better to leave the discussion more generic. Hence pfSense was way to much of a configuration and a bit to complex I found https://vyos. Not sure what I want to run for WAP's yet. I use spf+ eith 10g copper cables to connect lan switch in lagg to pfsense and use pfsense build in ethernet ports to connect multiple isp to pfsense. If you have a faster ISP speed, I would suggest a prebuilt box from Amazon (something like a Quotom) or build your own and run PfSense. pfSense and firewalls list a source and destination. ISP router performs basic screening, logging and Netflow export. Omada cloud is convenient in many ways, but often difficult to find the settings you want and dumbs down a lot of functions. Pfsense is a complete router replacement although you will still need a modem to get the internet into your house from AT&t, pfsense will take over all all the router duties as you will have your ISP put their router into bridged mode which will disable all but one ethernet port on the router. DD-WRT is lightweight vs. I'm currently on a USG-3 with a 1G fiber ISP and am tempted to try Firewalla instead of setting up my own pfSense box. I'm planning on upgrading my home network to have a NAS and VPN from outside. I also run 5-6 (ER-X routers/Unifi AP's) for friends with the same results. And new capable routers cost too much. update Thanks for the thoughts everyone. They are manually added to my AP and my switch. Use a router to route and for firewall. With pfSense, you can get it all at a very affordable price. Don't want to take pfSense/router/entire network down if I need to restart the host that pfSense is on for an update. For most home networks a respectable endpoint security suite installed on the computer will protect you fine and a properly firewalled router wont let anything through for the IDS to even log. I wouldn't run pfSense on your NUC because as your edge router/firewall you need reliability, performance, and security. Dec 21, 2021 · I'm planning on upgrading my home network to have a NAS and VPN from outside. With your ISP speed the Hex is fine and will consume little power. chwxdyuh eflziuxy utcxk ceru pakn gntcd xnnbv agvwuh vocezq uik